very rightly points out passages of text: Excerpts from a 9-page Schrüftstück of Prof. Dr. Manfred Kappes (Erziehungswissenschafler). The full document can be found here @ http://www.veh-ev.info/archivpdf/profkappeler.pdf (9 pages and 3 pages of the first part of the second part, 12 pages ) » Prof. Dr. Manfred Kappes: From the" Interim Report "of the Round Table, home education on the draft" final report "- read between the lines II "
[ Page 4 ]
» [ ... ] . It does not matter whether the children and young people in residential care injustice done "intended by law" was or not, and it does not make any difference if the actual wrong done as a "goal" of home education was formulated or not. Decisive is the fact that this injustice has happened and that, all the knowledge that the RTH in its "reclamation" even brought to light, has been committed systematically. The system was wrong and the system that produced it was therefore an unjust system. Because the system it was [ ... ] , it is inherently so compelling produced wrong. That for this system were responsible institutions and individuals that ultimately "made by man" and that it, like the few exceptions, thank God, have shown would be "unavoidable" have been if the institutions and people to meet their responsibilities become would be no argument against the injustice system, but and can confirm it in the first place the question of responsibility and guilt of institutions and people that are made from the perspective of human dignity and human rights must always be. «« «
" [ Page 5 ]
» In [" Endberich ", ie" Roundtable residential care "Final Report-] 'design' is attempts to blur the sharp controversy between the former home children on RTH and the majority of institutional representatives on the issue of financial compensation by it claims, "the round table" hold a qualification of home education as a general wrong "not appropriate and possible." As formulated, this sentence was the
[ Page 6 ]
compensation proposal of the former children's home at the round table in front of all those involved in this body for several months, by starting from an unjust system.
To return to the "system issue". My proposal to the homes as the focal point of the home education system "(also the" way into the home "is included) with the advanced features of Goffman of the" total Institution to analyze "is the RTH and the accompanying scientific research included conceptual, applied to the descriptive level and been rejected on the analytical level. In their report to one of us jointly supervised PhD on the home education of the forties to seventies, writes my colleague Silvia Staub-Bernasconi, that was part of the total institution residential care, "that young people had to be secured with its work, the economic existence of the home. These geographical and / or structural, quasi-natural restriction of social contact was with the environment, exacerbated by social isolation. The entrance was humiliating, depersonalization Rituals to deletion of the proper name, the release of all personal property connected. This included unanticipated inspections, censorship and access to personal mail, time element of the vacation, isolation cell on bread and water, the threat of referral to more rigorous institutions, etc. Such a system of government must also social relationships and friendships - reciprocal interaction relations - to stop, because the may be possible collectivization of all common problems about social interactions in a clear social area (...) to a threat to the institution of the power system. "
The methods of education in the homes describes dust Bernasconi as methodisierte violence, that is as physical, especially sexual health, and also psycho-physical, psychological and social violence, accompanied by irrational, erratic behavior (violence, sudden escalation, etc.). "He continued:" The here described practices can not be described as sporadic, deplorable acts of individual perpetrators, but they have system ', that is, they describe the standards and rules of institutionalized Home Rules and their implementation by the owner of hierarchical positions in a social structure with different formalized, negative command - and sanction violence in everyday life. And this home order was based only on unconditional surrender, duty, and absolute obedience without any right to something "Almost all homes of the" system offense. "- From the baby home to care reform school - had structures similar organization and organizational cultures" in the sense of institutionalized horizontal and vertical position and fixed obligations (...) for social domestic and foreign relations and the resulting behavior rules and strategies in everyday life (eg increased attention to exposure, stigma,
[ Page 7 ]
food deprivation etc.). " 2 dust Bernasconi argues that the practice of education in total institutions and their consequences for the people who were subject to them, with the personal rights (right of integrity, freedom, etc.) and social rights, such as financial compensation for forced labor and social security in old age, to interpret their current redemption it must go in the "Recommendations" of the RTH. «« «
" [page 8 ]
» would create a new dynamic, if one member of the" chain of responsibility "the courage would apply to give the reference to the chain discipline related to quantify its contribution to the compensation to assure that amount payable irrespective of the decision of the other "links". With the performance of his ethical and moral responsibility for their own homes in the wrong done to the children and young people and suffering, would this "link" the others in the "links" urge to follow suit. Such a step - out of the entrenchment behind "the others" and "still outstanding amounts and practices" - would be the two churches and their charities well received. They would thus their importance of them repeatedly complained just as the social conscience of society. The "chain of responsibility" is currently a responsibility to prevent chain become. This is most evident at the position of countries who want to only participate in a financial compensation if all agree the West German federal states. What really prevents North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony, the great "red-green" and "black-yellow" ruled the so-called surface states from giving the country an example?
The willingness to provide financial compensation the acid test of whether the rehabilitation of ex-institutionalized children is serious and the RTH ultimately the great hopes that have been set on its foundation in him, but still met. If this hope is disappointed, it is the "second trauma" are many former children in care, with the result of despair, anger and aggression. Finally
is worth remembering that the former home children who have experienced in so-called Disabled Facilities suffering and injustice, to be involved fully in rehabilitation and compensation must.
The same applies to the victims of the residential care of the former GDR, who demand their long-standing recognition and at a meeting in Erfurt on 17 November these demands are clearly related to stress. «« «
" [page 9 ]
» The financial compensation is the main conflict in the final round of the RTH and in its aftermath. But the other, on the whole, consensual activities discussed, especially those required by the former home children "independent bases" need to be precise in the sense of the former children's home in the recommendations - and their implementation will cost money.
The results of the Round Table and Home Education its practical implementation is a test of the political culture of the old and new Federal Republic, which regards itself as a liberal democratic state, for the orientation are the rights guaranteed in the Constitution, fundamental rights to human dignity and human rights, the supreme political and ethical Bid needs. «« «
_________________________
2 title of the thesis, to which this advice: Eilert, Jürgen. Psychology of human rights - human rights violations in the German home system from 1945 to 1973 in the mirror of nine resumes, the Committee on Petitions of the German Bundestag were presented on 11.12.2006. Free University Berlin, Department of Education and Psychology. 2010).
See also the note dated 12.11.2010 and since then comments TO in Dierk Schaefer's Blog @ http://dierkschaefer.wordpress.com/ , ie the local article with the headline " Prof. Dr. Manfred Kappes: From the" Interim Report "of the Round Table, home education on the draft" final report "- read between the lines II "
CROSS REFERENCE : 09/11/2010 http://heimkinderopfer2.blogspot document by Christian Sailer lawyer about a case in Bavaria "@ : » "home victim rights activists" in action for former children in care " .com/2010/11/heimopfer-rechtsverfechter-im-einsatz.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Everyone can also HERE a substantive comment in this FORMER CHILDREN'S HOME BLOG 1 to this " " home-victims rights activists "in action for former children in care": 11/09/2010 document of Prof. Dr. Manfred Kappes (educationist) "report - AND ALSO TO ALL ANOTHER REPORT ON THIS BLOG ! - give, and every such comment will then be HERE also visible to all readers.
comments = comments can of Post a Comment click buttons are given in the footer of this paper (ie, use a scroll little bit down, where is the Post a Comment to find buttons).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_________________________________________________________________
My [ie Martin Mitchell] own current signature: A hearing or proceeding without qualified legal counsel, the law is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards, and an indictment für jede "Demokratie" und angeblichen "Rechtsstaat", wo versucht wird dies einzuschränken.
My [ ie. Martin MITCHELL’s ] own current signature: Negotiation with the perpetrators, your detractors and opponents without QUALIFIED legal counsel present and by your side throughout and at all times, and without reliance upon the law and jurisprudence, is like a building without a foundation – a house of cards, and any attempt at curtailment of these rights is clear evidence of incompetence, incapability and incapacity of a country’s "constitutionality" and it’s "democracy".
__________________________________
" We must not wait until the freedom struggle, called treason '. "(Erich Kästner )
0 comments:
Post a Comment