.
LAW ! - The duties of the state towards the children home.
equality before the law --- equality and the rule of law
first ) Dama Lige systemic intentionally committed PROSECUTION frustration in the Federal Republic of Germany in the "Youth welfare" and "home education".
second ) Dama Lige systemic committed intentionally broke the law in the Federal Republic of Germany in the "Youth welfare" and "home education".
third ) Dama Lige systemic intentionally committed SUPERVISION FAILURE in the Federal Republic of Germany in the "Youth welfare" and "home education".
4th ) Where was the time in the Federal Republic of Germany, the state, the police, prosecutors and the PERFORM THEIR DUTY what the children in care (underage protegee;! Ward ) and systemic intentionally committed MISTREATMENT and ARBEITSAUSBEUTING these children in the home " many places of evil" (" RTH "), by the leaders and shared responsibility in youth welfare " and "home education" refers to?
5th ) ALL THESE time against institutionalized children (minors wards;! Ward ) in the Federal Republic of Germany in the " many places of evil " (" RTH ") intentionally committed CRIME were " serious violations of basic human rights "/" serious human rights violations "Viewed separately, both overall as well.
6th ) Due to the system then was in the Federal Republic Germany No action possible for the Victims ALL THIS CRIME , even after they attain the age, nor is there today, systemic in nature, in the Federal Republic of Germany and most other such legal action possible.
7th ) Systemic intentionally committed TORTURE and SLAVERY during the war, both in peacetime as well - but also individual cases of torture and SLAVERY anytime ! - are " serious human rights violations " and are defined as " crimes against humanity " and categorized and punished .
8th ) ALL SUCH CRIMES no statute of limitations !
( A. ) Which of the non-religious and atheists, discussed here in relation to each of spot me, disagree ?
( B. ) Which of the church members and religious supporters, raised here in relation to each of spot me, disagree ?
( C. ) Whoever, by any group whatsoever, would still LESS rule of law and MORE authoritarian approach do?
represents the other hand, of course, the question :
When are in the Federal Republic of Germany, the profits from that contravene human rights offenses safe from seizure under national law ?
" under national law " means in this question : " according to German criminal law . Does anyone know the correct
and authoritative answer to this question ?
added to the latter question is already answered someone as follows:
If not time-barred crimes against humanity may, at any time "profiteers" condemned and will be asked to pay.
Even if the polluter has died, will not set the prosecution of the offense, but rests only and can always be pursued again. That is, with all the trimmings, including confiscating profits were skimmed off from the offense.
And then I made as a parallel also to the following scenario Discussion :
And now I have another new question :
An example of an ordinary long ago committed a serious crime for which the perpetrator was never punished because he was never caught for it. - Until now.
If an ordinary criminal - no " criminals " one commits " offense " , " to the weight after a severe violation of human rights corresponds " - but a thief and Bank robbers in a bank robbery in 1965 in the Federal Republic of Germany - kill without someone during this bank robbery or injure - stole gold and diamonds worth several million dollars, which was postponed to 2011 comes out, he may keep the thief and bank robber, this stolen gold and the diamonds stolen, now worth several billion euros, because even his crime under German law and has long been barred ?
If the German company would be the German churches, would be the German government and German banks which would be the enthusiastic and willing to provide safe and to ensure that the bank robber could keep his prey from his bank robbery and also since the resulting value ? - If one were to categorize this then in all of Germany as a "successful" venture and celebrate ?
And I do not want to know what should be, but what's really in the matter - under the law - is or would be.
Whereupon me Someone - Under laws - immediately following enlightened :
[ after a reference only once and execution of the Criminal Code § 78 - Limitation period ]
Even if the bank has no title, he is to repayment obligation.
Although claims for damages from unlawful acts, both under the old, and under the new law after 3 years. But § 852 BGB
to the person liable, even after entry of the statute of limitations for the publication of information obtained under the provisions of § § 812 ff BGB required.
In this case, he can not rely on "impoverishment" since under § 819 BGB in conjunction with § 818 IV BGB this is excluded in the claims UNERTLAUBTER FROM ACTION.
to the criminal statute of limitations (§ § 78ff, 79ff StGB) the whole is otherwise completely independent. The only concern the prosecution or the execution of the sentence.
My own final comment to this discussion course was, then following a correct summary, the new law raises questions :
FIRST:
This applies now to "the illegal loot" / " the unjust enrichment "/" Illegal profit creation "by the offender and the offender in terms of" illegal labor exploitation "and" prohibited forced labor "for underage" proteges "who are in their" care were "to ?
SECOND:
" forced labor is prohibited by the Basic Law , although the Basic Law itself, of course, is not a criminal or represents and the Criminal Law itself not be replaced, just like the" EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS "the criminal law replaced. But
although in this " final report " this lawless body which is " Roundtable residential care " (" RTH ") calls his utmost attempts and has done the concept of FORCED LABOR "itself to not using is versatile granted even in this" final report "that" in many places of evil "(in these" care dens "! ) minor" protegee " ie " children in " many severe abuse (indictable serious crimes and violations of the law ! ), including labor exploitation [ today actually so named in the Criminal Code ! were driven ], ie PROHIBITED " FORCED LABOR " exposed , from the " beneficiaries " their " profit " have . And this " illegal profit creation " is a " unjust enrichment " at the expense of the suffering and damage to their victims . Should they now have their " illegally accumulated from prey " and may retain from the investments of this " prey " managed to get hold assets ?
would allow the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic of Germany and allow this to really ?
Similarly, in the opinion of the Australian Martin Mitchell, highly relevant to answer the question of what falls in the category of a " contravene human rights offense ", ie, if committed in the Federal Republic's territory or under its jurisdiction, which in the category of these crimes is, the statute of limitations:
THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT in its decision in the federal administrative court , Judgement of 5.3.2009 - 10 C 51 07 - (not in a case involving the former GDR , but in one case in today's Federal Republic, which was about to decide whether the present situation in another country from the one in Germany seeking protection Assylbewerber " a serious violation of a fundamental human right " represents, must be the basis of which he was granted in Germany Assyl) - DEFINES WHAT " a serious violation of a fundamental human right " IS .
federal administrative court, ruling 5.3.2009 - 10 C 51 07 @ http://lexetius.com/2009, 1586 (Full text )
TAGS / LABELS unlimited : GERMANY, BRD, FRG, systemic, Dama Lige systemic intentionally committed PROSECUTION obstruction, systemic intentionally committed PROSECUTION frustration, Dama Lige systemic intentionally committed PROSECUTION frustration in the Federal Republic of Germany in youth welfare and residential care , Federal Republic of Germany, law enforcement frustration, deliberately, youth welfare, residential care, rights, duties, obligations of the state towards the children in institutions, obligations of the state, equality, law, equality before the law, equality and rule of law, Rule of law, the law, broke the law in the Federal Republic of Germany, systemic committed intentionally broke the law, committed intentionally broke the law, Dama Lige systemic committed intentionally broke the law in the Federal Republic of Germany in youth welfare and residential care, SUPERVISION FAILURE systemic intentionally committed SUPERVISION FAILURE intentionally committed SUPERVISION FAILURE, Dama Lige systemic intentionally committed SUPERVISION FAILURE the Federal Republic of Germany in youth welfare and residential care, government, police, prosecutors, EXERCISE THEIR DUTY, DUTY, institutionalized children, wards, minor wards, Ward, systemic intentionally committed abuse, intentionally committed abuse, systemic intentionally committed abuse and ARBEITSAUSBEUTING, abuse and ARBEITSAUSBEUTING, abuse, ARBEITSAUSBEUTING, many places of evil, places of evil, RTH, responsible and jointly responsible, responsible, responsibility, responsible, responsibility, responsible and shared responsibility in youth welfare and residential care, intentionally committed crimes, crimes, injuries, serious injuries, serious violations of fundamental human rights, human rights, human rights abuses, grave human rights violations, individually seen, overall, the systemic nature of legal action wherever possible to avoid litigation wherever possible to avoid legal action for victims, no legal action for victims ALL OF THIS CRIME, majority, torture and slavery, torture, slavery, systemic intentionally committed torture, deliberately committed torture, systemic intentionally committed TORTURE and slavery, war, peace, defined crimes against humanity, categorized, sanctioned, barred, ALL SUCH CRIMES statute of limitations, not time-barred, non-religious, atheists, non-religious and atheists, church members, religious adherents is raised here with respect to each mine point of law, less rule of law, more authoritarian approach, crime, human rights abuses offenses, profits, profiteers, profits from that contravene human rights crimes, confiscation, national law as to when in the Federal Republic of Germany, the profits from contravene human rights offenses safe from seizure, according to German criminal law, criminal law, crimes against humanity, crimes against humanity not barred convicted, the fund asked polluter, polluters, died prosecution of the crime, prosecution of the offense is not set, pulling in profits that have been siphoned out of the offense, corresponding long ago committed a serious crime, offenders, criminals, habitual criminals, crime, the weight after a severe violation of human rights, thief, bank robber, bank robbery, gold, diamonds, gold and diamonds, diamonds in the values of several million dollars stolen, stolen, stolen gold, stolen diamonds, valued at several billion euros, German society, German churches, churches, German States, German banks, bank robber's loot from his bank robbery, value, Germany, successful endeavor, the law according to the Criminal Code § 78 limitation period, banking, title, redemption, obligation, damages, claims in tort, tort, issue, § § 812 ff BGB, impoverishment, § 819 BGB, § 818 IV BGB PUBLISHING RIGHTS FROM UNERTLAUBTER ACT criminal law unjust enrichment, illegal profit creation, illegal income creation by the offender and the offender perpetrators, perpetrator, perpetrators properties, illegal labor exploitation, labor exploitation, illegal forced labor, forced labor, underage wards, minors, wards, minor wards, welfare, illegal profit creation on the part of perpetrators and offender characteristics in relation to illegal labor exploitation, illegal income creation by the offender and the offender characteristics in relation to illegal labor exploitation and illegal forced labor, illegal income creation by the offender and the offender in relation to illegal labor exploitation and illegal forced labor of minor wards, basic law, forced labor is prohibited by the Basic Law , EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION, Final Report, Round Table residential care, RTH, care dens, many severe abuse, serious indictable offenses and violations of the law, serious crime, serious crimes and violations of the law, beneficiaries, unjust enrichment at the expense of the suffering and damage to their victims, at the expense of the suffering and damage to its victim, unlawfully allow it accumulated loot accumulated loot, plunder, investments of this booty, managed to get hold assets, property, jurisdiction, jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, and allow permit, allow, Martin Mitchell, contravene human rights offenses, jurisdiction, Federal Administrative Court, decision in the federal administrative court, Judgement of 5.3.2009 - 10 C 51 07, issue, a serious violation of a fundamental human right, a serious violation of fundamental human rights, violation of a fundamental human right
CROSS REFERENCE : » GERMANY: committed serious human rights violations on the part of the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, systematically and for decades! "@ http://heimkinderopfer2.blogspot.com/2011/01/germany-schwerwiegende.html (release date: January 3, 2011)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Everyone can also HERE a substantive comment in This FORMER CHILDREN HOME BLOG 1 to these " system back then intentionally committed PROSECUTION frustration inherent in the Federal Republic of Germany in the" Youth welfare "and" home education ". "report - AND ALSO TO EACH OTHER IN THIS REPORT BLOG ! - give, and every such comment will then be HERE also visible to all readers.
comments = comments can by clicking the Post a Comment be buttons in the footer of this paper submitted (ie, use a scroll little bit down, where is the Post a Comment to find buttons).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_________________________________________________________________
My [ie Martin Mitchell] own current signature: A hearing or proceeding without qualified legal counsel, the law is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards und ein Armutszeugnis für jede "Demokratie" und angeblichen "Rechtsstaat", wo versucht wird dies einzuschränken.
My [ ie. Martin MITCHELL’s ] own current signature: Negotiation with the perpetrators, your detractors and opponents without QUALIFIED legal counsel present and by your side throughout and at all times, and without reliance upon the law and jurisprudence, is like a building without a foundation – a house of cards, and any attempt at curtailment of these rights is clear evidence of incompetence, incapability and incapacity of a country’s "constitutionality" and it’s "democracy".
__________________________________
" We must not wait until the freedom struggle, called treason '. "(Erich Kästner )
0 comments:
Post a Comment