.
ask "the former home children"
the rulers / the public representatives and citizens Representatives the Federal Republic of Germany and all those responsible, jointly responsible in this matter
(including, among others, the Chancellor Angela Merkel [ CDU ] ; the Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle [ FDP ] ; the Minister of Finance Wolfgang Schäuble [ CDU ] ; the Secretary of Labor / Social Security Ursula von der Leyen [ CDU ]) ; Lammert President of the Bundestag Norbert [ CDU]).
precedent re FORCED LABOR
COMPARISON:
first ) "Forced labor" in a dictatorship, and especially to "war", and 2 ) "Forced labor" in a "rule of law" to "peace time".
Both are "crimes against humanity" / "human rights violations" / "human rights violations."
Which is the more serious and morally reprehensible larger and more crime committed to 'war', or committed to "peace"?
first ) During the twelve years were the period 1933 to 1945, among others, also German citizens of Jewish faith in " Third Reich," in a " dictatorship " ! , especially during " wartime " ! , and their freedom to robbed "forced labor " used, or " forced to work" without having to be paid . --- These were mostly in teenagers and young adults of both sexes (these were by the Nazis as slave laborers " preferred).
second ) From the mid to late 1940s, in 1949, in the 1950s, in the 1960s, in the 1970s, in a alleged " law " ! , ie " peacetime " ! were German citizens, both as well as "vagrants" and "stateless", minors evangelical faith, minors Catholic faith and minor Jewish in " West Germany " / in " Federal Republic of Germany - ie children, young people and young adults of both sexes aged 6 to 21 years - and their freedom to robbed "forced labor " used, or " forced to work" to be paid without having , and this happened (at least after 1949) ANYWHERE in " West Germany ( in all " states "! ) contrary to 22 since May 1949 existing German Basic Law, as well as both the counter there around the same time this relevant ends INTERNATIONAL LAW AND LAW (which the States for the Protection of " human rights" committed and have had ! ).
a legally binding precedent / a final court decision on EXACTLY THIS " FORCED LABOR - SITUATION was decided in a ruling by the district court in Braunschweig on 20 June 1965, and no revision has been at the time of appeal against this ruling !
Brief Excerpt: quotes from the 283-page nonfiction
by Benjamin B. Ferencz [ lawyer and lawyer for the victims, New York ]
wage of horror
Translated from the American Ruth Treuth
Campus Verlag Frankfurt / New York, 1981 ISBN 3-593-32916-6
» [ Page 216]
[ in the" case "against diamond Büssing ,
re Judgement of 20/06/1965, document number 13 C 566/64 ]
[ in the "case" of Diamond v. Bussing ,
re decision of 06.20.1965, Court File No.. 13 C 566/64 ]
A Pyrrhusieg
first he did not dare to give his name. He was a Jew, born in Chemnitz, been in the camps, emigrated to Israel and then returned to Germany to live in Frankfurt. Someone threw a stone at his car window after he had exposed a former Nazi, the Auschwitz survivor was shocked. He preferred to remain anonymous, but it hurt so much, and he was so angry that he could not suppress his anger any longer. 526
In the summer of 1944, when Adolf diamond was 20 years old, he was was from the ghetto of Lotz, in which he was deported, put into the concentration camp Auschwitz / Birkenau. His parents immigrated directly to the gas chambers. One day in September, two civilians appeared to morgentlichen appeal, one of which, as it turned out, was an engineer Pfender. They called on all the metal workers to step forward one step. Diamond was among the approximately 2,000 young men who were taken away. It was intended to work under the control of the concentration camp Neuengamme for Büssing in Brunswick, where trucks were produced for the Army. In April 1945 he was freed.
In 1957, Diamond visited his former master, its trucks and buses were seen everywhere in Germany. He had no difficulty finding a witness to the Büssing get the confirmation that he had worked for the company and that the company had removed money for his services to the Neuengamme. Similar explanations were given several other inmates. 527 wuren The certificates issued each time when a former inmate wrote to the
[ Page 215]
company and asked for compensation. They were attached to a polite letter with which the former prisoner was informed that the company does not had other choice but to accept the concentration camp workers against their will, that the company had done everything possible to alleviate the suffering of the prisoners and that it had paid for the services of the SS, and consequently, the demand on the German government will be addressed. At the same time warned against the company if it would be sued, to plead his defense to include the statute of limitations.
Adolf Diamant, who had heard of the decision of the Frankfurt court in the case against Wollheim IG Farben and the following agreement, began a lawsuit against Brunswick in Büssing [ appear in 1964 ] . The style of argument, that is the firm's Defence was served, during the negotiation and more sharply. The company challenged the plaintiffs, claiming that he was an Israeli citizen, who - according to Nazi law - not as a German could be treated. It was suspected that the plaintiff in Tel Aviv was a Marxist, his Frankfurt apartment serves as a shelter (see Frankfurter Rundschau from 06/22/1965). This angered Adolf diamond so that his whole story to the press passed on and it repeated on German television. 528
The compensation trust company registered several hundred claims of former Büssing-workers, However, the Claims Conference took in her case, nothing. The only thing possible would be the start of a test case, but the energetic Mr. Diamond had already done on your own. Ernst Katzenstein asked Diamants German lawyers simply have to keep him informed of further progress. 529
The district court stated in its decision that Büssing was in possession of a complete list of his former concentration camp worker who was also on the diamond name. The fact , that the company had paid the SS services was , not considered exculpatory , since , the judge, no one is entitled to , to buy the labor power of a person , the law of their liberty has been deprived , and that, therefore, the contract between Bussing and SS null and void . It also claims that the German Restitution Act, the defendants not decrease its liability because the law is no compensation for services of the plaintiff against the defendant provides. A traditional principle of German case law - gestio - says , that everyone assumes , knowingly of another worker and derives an advantage to pay , it had . Claims which accrue to the court, would have a period of 30 years [ decision of 06.20.1965 ] .
[ Page 216]
The Braunschweig court carefully calculated the time that the applicant has worked for the Angklagten. It came to 1.778 hours. The court decided that under the wartime wage controls, the corresponding Hourly wage was 1 RM and the plaintiff therefore was entitled to RM 1.778, which according to the law on currency reform of 1948 the ratio of 10:1 converted to DM. The plaintiffs were therefore only DM 177.80 zu.530 is far as is known, has brought Büssing no revision, and thus the sentence was final. The plaintiff won his case.
____________________________________
comments [ Page 258]:
526 : The story of Adolf Diamond first appeared in the German press, without giving his identity known, see Frankfurter Rundschau , 06/22/1965.
527 : received letter from Leo to Büssing Konstam, 03/15/1957, an identical explanation Abraham Hochman, 08/27/1957.
528 : letter from Adolf to the diamond structure , 10.8.1965.
529 : andr letter from EK. Paul Meister and Dr. Wolfgang Boening, Frankfurt, 23.06.1965.
530 : decision of the Regional Court of Braunschweig in the Long case against diamond Büssing, 6/20/1965, file number 13 C 566/64; in construction , 27/08/1965, was reported. «« «
Cited from the above source.
Finally, the following Judgement of the Bundesgerichtshof:
" human rights violation " / " human rights crimes " not barred !
» human rights violations
lawyer Gerrit Wilmans, which represents the interests of children in care, criticized the interim report [ 17.01.2010 of lawless Panel that" Roundtable residential care in the 50s and 60s "calls on the Lutheran theologian and pastor Dr. Antje Vollmer ( GREEN politician and former Bundestag Vice-President) presided ] that he systematic injustice that happened to the children in institutions, not as a "violation of human rights' values: is" The reason for this provision is obvious: If one were to speak of human rights violations, it could be the limitation of the crimes are exposed, which would mean that the children in care a legal basis for material compensation possessed "Wilmans referred in this context to a BGH (Federal Supreme Court - 5 StR 451/99 ). the uninitiated, the award of drugs to, underage athletes evaluated as a human rights violation. In this case, the court ruled that the statute of limitations was in abeyance because of that offense "of a quasi-legal persecution obstacle. "The rest was the prescription of the wrong doings in the case referred to grounds that they were not inherent to the system pursued by the regime of the SED," said Wilmans. "Do we have this logic not apply to the case of children in care? Here, too, but it would need the prescription of the perpetrators rest in the homes because they were proven by the camaraderie of the state with the church home media also does not persecuted for reasons inherent to the system! If the damaging cronyism of church and state now continue at the Round Table, as it now seems to be the case, then this casts a bad light on the constitution of our society! " « ««
Quoted from the article » children in - of church and state " verschaukelt in hpd - Humanist Press , February 1, 2010 - 10:37 No. 8711 @ http://hpd.de/node/8711
The words "human rights violation "," human rights violations ", and even the simple word" crimes "in general, are also in the" roundtable residential care "on 12.13.2010 submitted" final report "(see @ http : / / www.rundertisch-heimerziehung.de/documents/Abschlussbericht_rth-1.pdf or, if this " RTH " website will soon disappear from the Internet, that is suddenly no longer be found, and @ http://s3.directupload.net/images/101228/ww9mtbfu.pdf ) nowhere to and also find the term " forced labor " regarding the "post-war German home education" was simply rejected and the whole thing to the detriment of all "stakeholders" trivialized ("under the then in the homes and in society prevailing circumstances" and " the times "as" acceptable "and" necessary "to consider [" RTH - Final Report, "page 29 ", "page 30 " and " page 31]). FOR the ten unnamed lawyers , on to " offenders " / " Schädigerseite " / " Defendant page " / " successor page " as "members" with " Round Table "were undoubtedly taken care . (In "victims page" were on " table rounds residential care " TO DETERMINE of " offenders "/" Schädigerseite "/" Defendant side e "/" successor page "no" advocates "or" lawyer "has been certified as ! ).
this to " offenders " / " Schädigerseite " / " Defendant page" / " successor page " as "members" with the » Round Table "sitting lawyers were : Lutz slings (CDU ) ; George law; Prof. Klaus Schäfer (SPD ) ; George Gorris; Dr. Hans Ulrich Anke ; Mario Jung Lass ; Michael Löher ; Thomas Mörsberg ; Prof. Dr. jur. Bernd Rüdiger-sun ; Prof. Dr. Peter Schruth ; and Dr. Jörg A. Kruttschnitt ( paralegal ). See also the article TO in FORMER CHILD HOME BLOG 1 » Antje Vollmer washes her hands in innocence. Others are responsible for ensuring that is "forced labor" is not approved for children in care, she said. "(from 19.04.2010) @ http://heimkinderopfer.blogspot.com/2010/04/antje-vollmer-wascht-ihre-hande-in.html
TAGS / LABELS unlimited (in German) : reprehensible, human rights abuses, forced labor, war, Friedensszeiten, former resident, precedent re FORCED LABOR, COMPARISON, dictatorship, Rule of law, crime, crimes against humanity, humanity, human rights abuses, human rights violations, reprehensible crimes German citizens, German citizens of Jewish faith, the Third Reich, freedom, deprived of their liberty, forced labor used forced labor, youth, young adults Nazis, forced laborers, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, homeless, stateless persons, minors, minors evangelical faith, minors Catholic faith, minors Jewish faith, West-Germany, Federal Republic of Germany, children, federal states, German Basic Law, International Law and Law, legal, law, States, the protection of human rights, legally binding precedent, final court decision, court ruling, FORCED LABOR SITUATION, Judgement, Judgement of the District Court of Braunschweig, Benjamin B. Ferencz, a lawyer and victim advocate, lawyer, lawyer for the victims, reward of horror, diamond against Bussing, Judgement of 06/20/1965, application number 13 C 566/64, Diamond v. Bussing, case of Diamond v. Bussing, decision of 20.06.1965, Court File No.. 13 C 566/64, A Pyrrhusieg, exposes Nazi, Auschwitz survivor, Adolf Diamant, Auschwitz / Birkenau concentration camp Neuengamme Büssing in Brunswick, trucks manufactured for the Army, trucks and buses, Büssing, for the company worked, inmates, company, compensation, former prisoner, concentration camp labor, concentration camp workers against their will, suffering of the prisoners, SS, services, German government sued, defense, statute of limitations, the trial of Bussing, trial Büssing in Brunswick, negotiation, Nazi law, plaintiff, Frankfurter Rundschau, history, press, German television, a few hundred claims of former Büssing-workers, district court decision, Büssing has a complete list of his former concentration camp workers, the company of the SS services paid considered not as a relief, no one is entitled to the work force of a to buy person who unlawfully their freedom has been deprived of the contract between Bussing and SS null and void, defendants, third party, a traditional principle of German case law, German law, jurisdiction, agency without authority any accepting knowingly of another work force and generates a advantage stemming pay for them have, claim, decision filed by 06.20.1965, Brunswick Court, working hours, revision, no revision, decision final, trial, lawyer Gerrit Wilmans, Gerrit Wilmans, interests of the resident, resident, Interim Report, Round Table residential care, Roundtable home education in the 50s and 60s, Protestant Theologian, Lutheran theologian and pastor, pastor, Lutheran theologian and pastor, Dr. Antje Vollmer, Rev. Dr. Antje Vollmer, Dr. Antje Vollmer, Antje Vollmer, Antje Vollmer, Greens politician Antje Vollmer Green Party politician and former Bundestag Vice President, systematic injustice the systematic injustice that the institutionalized children befell not wrong that the institutionalized children befell worth as a human rights violation, voice control, limitation exposed to the crime, legal basis, evaluated legal basis for material compensation, material compensation, allocation of drugs to the uninitiated minors in sport as a human rights violation, persecution obstacle Suspension of limitation period for acts of injustice, inherent in the system, regime, the case of children in care, proven camaraderie of the state with the church home-makers, systemic reasons, damaging cronyism of church and state, round table, constitution of our society, children in care - from the state and churches verschaukelt, By State and churches verschaukelt, hpd, Humanist Press, the final report, term forced labor, postwar German residential care, stakeholders, trivialized, homes, society, the prevailing circumstances, circumstances, zeitgeist, acceptable, necessary, deemed necessary, RTH, RTH-final report, lawyers, perpetrators, Schädigerseite , Defendant side, successors page Victim's side, to provisions of the perpetrators, lawyers, not lawyers, not lawyers or who authorized, legal, Lutz slings, CDU, George Law, Klaus Schäfer, Klaus Schäfer, SPD, Georg Gorris, Dr. Hans Ulrich Anke, Hans Ulrich Anke Mario Jung Lass, Michael Löher, Thomas Mörsberg, Prof. Dr. jur. Bernd Rüdiger-sun, Bernd-Rüdiger suns, Peter Schruth, Prof. Dr. Peter Schruth, Dr. Jörg A. Kruttschnitt, Jörg A. Kruttschnitt, FORMER CHILDREN'S HOME BLOG, BLOG FORMER CHILDREN'S HOME # 1, Antje Vollmer washed their hands of , Antje Vollmer washes her hands in innocence Others are responsible for ensuring that forced labor for children in care is not recognized it says, governments, the rulers, civil representatives, citizen representatives, Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel, Angela Merkel, CDU Vice Chancellor, Foreign Minister, Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister, Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, Guido Westerwelle, FDP, Finance Minister, Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, Minister of Labour, Social Affairs, Minister of Labour / Social Affairs Ursula von der Leyen, Ursula von der Leyen, Federal President, Bundestag President, Bundestag President Norbert Lammert, Bundestag President Norbert Lammert, Norbert Lammert, children in forced labor, West Germany, Absolute Prohibition of all forms of forced labor (compulsory labor), prohibition of forced labor, compulsory labor, occupational therapy, work training, work discipline, work force, worker specifications, unentlohnte forced labor, legal, use, enjoyment, usufruct of forced labor, international crimes, serious violations of human rights, restriction of human freedom, German children in care, child slaves, decent compensation and reparation, compensation
IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
IN ENGLISH
Short text-extract: quoted out of the 249-page non-fiction book
of Benjamin B. Ferencz [ Attorney at Law, New York ]
LESS THAN SLAVES
Indiana University Press (2002 edition) ISBN 0-253-21530-7
(pbk.)
Originally published by Harvard University Press 1979
» [ page 172 ]
[ in the" case "of Diamond v. Bussing ,
re decision of 20.06.1965, Court File No.. 13 C 566/64 ]
[ in the "case" against diamond Büssing ,
re Judgement of 06/20/1965, Aktenzeichen 13 C 566/64 ]
A Pyrrhic Victory
At first he was afraid to give his name. He was a Jew who was born in Chemnitz, had been in camps, had immigrated to Israel, and had then returned to Germany to live in Frankfurt. Someone had thrown a rock through his car window when he had exposed a former Nazi, and the Auschwitz survivor was frightened. He would have preferred to remain anonymous, but he became so bitter and enraged that he could no longer contain his anger. 2
In the summer of 1944, when Adolf Diamant was twenty, he was transferred from the ghetto at Lodz, to which he had been deported, to the concentration camp at Auschwitz/Birkenau. His parents went straight to the gas chambers. One September day, two civilians appeared at the morning roll call, including one who was identified as an engineer by the name of Pfender, and demanded that all metal workers step forward. Diamant was one of about two thousand young men who were taken away. He was assigned, under control of the concentration camp at Neuengamme, to work in Braunschweig (Brunswick) for the Büssing Company, which was busy manufacturing trucks for the army. In April 1945 he was liberated.
In 1957 Diamant visited his former employer, whose trucks and busses could be seen all over Germany. He had no difficulty in obtaining a certificate from the Bussing Company confirming that he had worked for the firm and that the company had made a payment for his services to the account of the concentration camp at Neuengamme. Similar declarations were given to several other former camp inmates. 3 The certificates were issued every time a former inmate wrote to the company and asked for compensation. It was attached to a polite letter explaining to the former prisoners that the company had no choice but to accept the concentration camp laborers against the company’s will, that the company had done all it could to ameliorate the suffering of the prisoners, and that the firm had already paid the SS for the services, hence the claim should be directed against the German government.
[ Page 173 ]
At the same time the company warned that, if sued, it would have to plead the statute of limitations as one of its defenses.
Adolf Diamant, having heard about the decision of the Frankfurt court in the Wollheim case against I.G. Farben and of the subsequent settlement, started a lawsuit against Büssing in Braunschweig [ apparently in 1964 ]. The tone of the defensive arguments raised by the company got sharper as the proceedings continued. The firm even challenged the identity of the complainant and said he was an Israeli citizen who could not, under a cited Nazi law, be treated as a German. It was suggested that the plaintiff from Tel Aviv was really a Marxist whose Frankfurt residence was a subterfuge. 4 This so annoyed Adolf Diamant that he called in the press, gave them the full story, and repeated it on German television. 5
Compensation Treuhand had registered a few hundred claims of former Büssing workers, but no action had been taken by the Claims Conference on their behalf. The most that could have been done would have been to start a test case, but the energetic Mr. Diamant had already done that on his own. Ernst Katzenstein simply asked Diamant’s German attorneys to keep him informed of further progress. 6
When the decision of the district court was handed down, it was found by the court that Büssing had a complete list of all former concentration camp workers, and that Diamant’s name was on the list. The fact that the company had paid the SS was held to be no defense since , according to the judge, no one was entitled to sell the labor of a person who had been unlawfully deprived of his freedom , and the contract between Büssing and the SS was therefore null and void . Furthermore, the German indemnification law could not absolve the defendant of liability since the law provided no compensation for the services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant. A traditional German juridical principle – Geschäftsführung ohne Auftrag – required that payment be made by anyone knowingly accepting another’s labor and deriving a benefit from it . Claims of that type, said the court, had a thirty-year filing period.
The Braunschweig court carefully computetd the time the plaintiff had worked for the defendant. It came to 1,778 hours of labor. The court concluded that, according to the wartime wage controls, the appropriate pay scale was RM 1 per hour, and therefore the plaintiff was entitled to RM 1,778, which, under the currency conversion law of 1948, had to be revalued into Deutsche Marks at the rate of RM 10 = DM 1. The plaintiff was accordingly [ on 20 June 1965 ] entitled to only DM 177.80, which, at the prevailing rate of exchange amounted to precisely [ US ] $44.45.7 As far as is known, the Büssing company did not file an appeal and the decision became final. The plaintiff slave laborer had won his case.
____________________________________
Notes [ page 238 ]:
2 : The story of Adolf Diamant first appeared in the German press without disclosing his identity; see Frankfurter Rundschau, June 22, 1965
3 : Letter from Bussing to leo Konstam. Mar. 15, 1957; identical certificate given to Abraham Hochmann, Aug. 27, 1957.
4 : See Frankfurter Rundschau , June 22, 1965.
5 : Letter from Adolf diamond to the construction , Aug. 27, 1965.
6 : Letter from EK to Dr. Paul Meister and Dr. Wolfgang Boening, Frankfurt, June 23, 1965.
7 : Decision of the District Court of Braunschweig, Diamond v. Bussing, June 20, 1965 court, file no 13 C 566/64; reported in 1965 in construction , Aug. 27. «« «
Quoted from the above Mentioned source.
In conclusion the following court decision decided in more recent times:
No statute of limitation applies to " human rights abuses " and " crimes against humanity ", a German decision of the highest court in the land:
BGH - 5 StR 451/99 !!!
TAGS / LABELS unlimited ( in English ) : BENJAMIN B. FERENCZ, BENJAMIN B. FERENCZ Attorney at Law New York, LESS THAN SLAVES, case of Diamant v. Büssing, decision of 20.06.1965, Court File No. 13 C 5
Adolf Diamant was twenty, concentration camp, concentration camp at Auschwitz/Birkenau, Auschwitz/Birkenau, gas chambers, metal workers, concentration camp at Neuengamme, Braunschweig, Brunswick, Büssing Company, manufacturing trucks, manufacturing trucks for the army, trucks and busses, Germany, certificate from the Bussing Company, worked for the firm, the company had made a payment for his services to the account of the concentration camp at Neuengamme, declarations, former camp inmates, camp inmates, compensation, asked for compensation, former prisoners, concentration camp laborers, suffering of the prisoners, firm had already paid the SS for the services, claim should be directed against the German government, German government, government, company, company warned, sued, plead the statute of limitations, statute of limitations, defenses, Adolf Diamant, lawsuit, lawsuit against Büssing, lawsuit against Büssing in Braunschweig, Büssing in Braunschweig, defensive arguments, proceedings, The firm even challenged the identity of the complainant, Nazi law, cited Nazi law, cited Nazi law, plaintiff, press, German television, former Büssing workers, test case, decision, decision of the district court, Büssing had a complete list of all former concentration camp workers, The fact that the company had paid the SS was held to be no defense, The fact that the company had paid the SS was held to be no defense since according to the judge no one was entitled to sell the labor of a person who had been unlawfully deprived of his freedom, unlawfully deprived of his freedom, the contract between Büssing and the SS was therefore null and void, liability, A traditional German juridical principle, Geschäftsführung ohne Auftrag, that payment be made by anyone knowingly accepting another’s labor and deriving a benefit from it, the Büssing company did not file an appeal, the decision became final, The plaintiff slave laborer had won his case, German press, No statute of limitation applies to human rights abuses and crimes against humanity, a German decision of the highest court in the land, BGH - 5 StR 451/99, Federal Republic of Germany, wards of the state, German wards of the state, institutionalised children, Institutionalised children used as slave laborers, slave laborers, demand, adequate compensation, demand adequate compensation and the making of Appropriate amends, the making of Appropriate amends
CROSS REFERENCE : » FORMER HOME FOR CHILDREN -" children in forced labor "- Where are all the children who had in West Germany 1945-1992 forced to work? "@ http://heimkinderopfer.blogspot.com/2010/07/ehemalige-heimkinder-heimkinder.html (release date: 17 July 2010)
CROSS REFERENCE: » Absolute prohibition of all forms of forced labor (compulsory labor) ! or not ? --- War "forced labor" / "compulsory labor" / "work therapy" / "labor education" / "work discipline" / "workfare" workers' contract "/" unentlohnte forced labor "then legal in the Federal Republic of Germany, not ? - Was something legal in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s and 1980s ? - Is it now legal in the Federal Republic of Germany ? --- Are not the use and enjoyment of forced labor international crimes and make them not serious human rights violations and restrictions of human freedom is ? "@ http://www.heimkinder-ueberlebende.org/Absolutes-Verbot-aller-Formen-von-Zwangsarbeit-und-Pflichtarbeit_-_Ist-meine-Auslegung-des-voelkerrechtlichen-IAO-Uebereinkommens-C029- richtig_-_oder-nicht.html (release date: 11 April 2007)
CROSS REFERENCE : » German children in care / child slaves ask for a decent compensation and reparation, no" severance "/" no hush money ", no "compromise"! --- German wards of the state / institutionalised children used as slave labourers (in the former West Germany) demand adequate compensation and the making of appropriate amends; they don't want to be "paid off" / "to be bribed henceforth to keep quiet"; no "compromise" ! « --- » German wards of the state / institutionalised children used as slave labourers (in the former West Germany) demand adequate compensation and the making of appropriate amends; they don't want to be "paid off" / "to be bribed henceforth to keep quiet"; no "compromise" ! --- Deutsche Heimkinder / Kindersklaven verlangen eine anständige Compensation and reparation, no "severance" / "no hush money", no "compromise"! "@ http://www.heimkinder-ueberlebende.org/Deutsche-Heimkinder,-then-child slaves-require-a-decent-and-indemnity Wiedergutmachung_-_No-severance, silence-no-money-not- Kompromiss.html (release date: 2 May 2007)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Everyone can also HERE a substantive comment in this FORMER HOME KIDS BLOG No . 1 to these " What's more reprehensible violations of human rights / forced labor" war "or human rights / forced labor" Friedensszeiten "? "report - AND ALSO TO EACH OTHER IN THIS REPORT BLOG ! - give, and every such comment will then be HERE also visible to all readers.
comments = comments can of Post a Comment click buttons in the footer of this paper are given (Ie, use a scroll little bit down, where is the Post a Comment to find buttons).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_________________________________________________________________
My [ie Martin Mitchell] own current signature: A hearing or proceeding without qualified legal counsel, the law is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards, and an indictment of every "democracy" and alleged "law" wo versucht wird dies einzuschränken.
My [ ie. Martin MITCHELL’s ] own current signature: Negotiation with the perpetrators, your detractors and opponents without QUALIFIED legal counsel present and by your side throughout and at all times, and without reliance upon the law and jurisprudence, is like a building without a foundation – a house of cards, and any attempt at curtailment of these rights is clear evidence of incompetence, incapability and incapacity of a country’s "constitutionality" and it’s "democracy".
__________________________________
„ We must not wait until the freedom struggle, called treason '. "(Erich Kästner )
0 comments:
Post a Comment